You’re reading an excerpt from the Today’s WorldView newsletter. Sign up to get the rest, including news from around the globe, interesting ideas and opinions to know, sent to your inbox every weekday.
The World Health Organization has a bold plan to better investigate the origins of covid-19 and other new outbreaks. It has assembled 26 highly respected scientists from around the world, carefully checked to be representative and free from conflicting interests, to form an independent group and consider not just how this pandemic started, but how other, future outbreaks might begin.
And yet this new plan is already encountering an old and familiar problem: the Chinese government. Without Beijing’s acquiescence, the hunt for the origins of covid-19 is likely to remain unresolved. This conundrum has caused serious concern about WHO’s organization and its ability to deal with complex world realities.
The proposed list of experts in WHO’s new group, the Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO), was announced Wednesday after a long period of development. The group is designed to avoid some of the issues that plagued the previous WHO-backed study of covid-19 origins, which saw a team of 10 international experts partner with Chinese researchers during a visit to Wuhan, where the first cases of covid-19 were reported.
WHO officials have framed the new body as a correction to the hyper-politicization of the issue of covid-19’s origin. Experts say the world needs to understand the origins of covid-19 — not to assign blame, but to ensure a disease doesn’t wreak such global havoc again. Establishing SAGO, a permanent organization that meets frequently could help to avoid mistakes.
But SAGO’s impact will be limited by default, given its nature as an advisory committee. It will be able to make recommendations to WHO if it feels something is worthy of further investigation. In turn, the WHO may request records from its members or permit an investigation to be conducted on their territory. The WHO cannot force member countries to comply with its orders, especially if they are powerful.
China has repeatedly said it considers the international investigation into covid-19’s origins on Chinese soil over.
China has not been an easy partner for the WHO. Though the global health body and its leader, Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, were initially criticized for being too close to Beijing, the dispute between them became clear in March when the joint WHO-China mission to Wuhan concluded that the suggestion that the coronavirus that causes covid-19 escaped from a lab in the city was “extremely unlikely” and not worthy of further investigation.
“Laboratory hypotheses must be examined carefully, with a focus on labs in the location where the first reports of human infections emerged in Wuhan,” the officials wrote.
The idea of a laboratory leak has attracted global attention. And new revelations that suggest gaps in information about what work was pursued at facilities in Wuhan make it appear there is far more work needed to be done to rule the hypothesis out.
But there is plenty more that could be investigated outside of laboratories, too. Reporting for The Post this week, Michael Standaert and Eva Dou took a look at the caves of Enshi prefecture, an agricultural corner of China’s Hubei province, a roughly six-hour drive west of Wuhan.
Enshi contains a karst cave system with numerous bats in its 37 miles of passages. Tourists and locals can visit the caves. Nearby small farms once housed hundreds of thousands of wild animals (authorities began clamping down on the wildlife trade in Enshi in December 2019). The Chinese government is not providing any information on whether or not the farm animals were ever infected with SARS-CoV-2.
“We really need to find out more about what viruses are circulating in those bats,” Michael Worobey, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona, told The Post. “That kind of proximity of farmed animals and bats that could be carrying coronaviruses is exactly the kind of thing we worry about.”
The WHO-China mission had included scores of recommendations for further study. Although Chinese officials claim they are continuing to study the issue, WHO officials still await an update.
There is little sign so far that China will give SAGO an easy ride. People’s Daily, a Communist Party mouthpiece, wrote earlier this month that China could not trust the WHO expert body, which had been announced but not filled, until it sought an investigation of Fort Detrick, a U.S. Army base and research center in Maryland that Chinese officials have claimed, without evidence, could be linked to the origin of covid-19.
China may have little reason to hope the truth comes out, even if the lab leak theory is unfounded. In the New Yorker this week, Carolyn Kormann noted that Chinese leader Xi Jinping had personally promoted the intensive farming practices that pushed people into closer contact with wild animals — potentially creating the circumstances for a virus to zoonotically spread from bats to humans via an unknown third animal.
“From one perspective, proving the virus has a natural origin is even worse for China. The policies of President Xi Jinping would be implicated if wildlife farms are responsible for the pandemic. Kormann wrote that if there were a laboratory leak, one or more scientists could be held responsible for an accident.
Gaining knowledge of how covid-19 began without China’s help has yielded few results so far. A U.S. intelligence review came out inconclusive. Many proposals to further investigate rely on China being pressured into cooperation. This could lead to more resistance from Beijing. Such moves could also disrupt tentative signs of detente between China and the United States.
SAGO will not be able to overrule Chinese interests — indeed, it is likely to be partially bound by them. One of the 26 members of the body is Yungui Yang of the Beijing Institute of Genomics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Yang was also a group leader on the controversial WHO-China mission and in interviews has called for “origins-tracing work in other countries,” echoing Beijing’s line.
But scientific collaboration could yield results. WHO officials would be interested in testing Wuhan’s blood banks to determine when the virus spread. In an apparent contradiction of Beijing’s own statements that the investigation within China is over, CNN reported Wednesday that an unnamed Chinese official said that up to 200,000 blood samples that could reveal clues about covid-19 from 2019, identified for further investigation by the WHO-China mission, will be tested soon.
It’s also the only option for WHO. Maria Van Kerkhove (head of WHO’s Emerging Disease and Zoonosis Unit) said that “We must work with countries, collaborate with them, and we need to go in.” That must happen. There can be no ambiguity.”